• Home
  • Articles
  • John Budd's paper, "Are Voluntary Agreements Better? Evidence From Baseball Arbitration"

John Budd's paper, "Are Voluntary Agreements Better? Evidence From Baseball Arbitration"

26 Feb 2015 12:30 PM | Mike Lillich (Administrator)

This paper empirically examines the widespread belief that voluntarily negotiated agreements produce better long-run relationships than third-party imposed settlements, such as arbitrator decisions or court judgments. Two key outcomes are analyzed—subsequent player performance and the durability of club-player relationship. Major League Baseball provides a compelling setting for these analyses because individual performance is well measured, there is the possibility of relationship breakdown, and both voluntary and imposed settlements are routinely used. While the results clearly show that a third-party imposed settlement is not better than a voluntary one, the evidence in support of the widespread belief is mixed. 

 

 Baseball arbitration paper v.3 (1) (1).pdf

 

 

 

 

Employment Policy Research Network (A member-driven project of the Labor and Employment Relations Association)

121 Labor and Employment Relations Bldg.

 

121 LER Building

504 East Armory Ave.

Champaign, IL 61820

 

The EPRN began with generous grants from the Rockefeller, Russell Sage, and Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundations

 

Powered by Wild Apricot Membership Software